Originally Posted by
eaglefly
That's one interpretation. Considering the source, it's a predictable one. Yes, at this point it is rumor though, hence the term used. But it's funny (and revealing) you criticize me for embellishing info from there and misrepresenting it here and then do the
Exact same thing with your #5. I didn't say "Envoy sucks", etc., that's just your spin (and you looooove to spin, don't you
). What's more telling though is 2), "But where will they get the pilots ?".
Seems many there see the forest through the trees (even the diseased ones thrown up here by the usual suspects to deflect reality) and know all too well Envoy is in serious trouble. Of course, if Wiki is correct, maybe not as it will need 900 less pilots in a few years. Anyhoo, thanks for the chuckle, even if it was predictable.
F in English for you.
I engaged in sarcasm and hyperbole to make a point. It is a deliberate embellishment for effect. That is obvious. I did
not cite an obviously made-up rumor on another forum as a basis for rumor-mongering with the inference that there might be some truth to it.
You greasily squirm out from under every criticism of your garbage posting only to pop up pointing your finger at your critic.
Anybody with access to those forums can easily verify the source of the rumor, however there are those here who cannot and your post is deliberately disingenuous, misleading those without access or the willingness to do some due diligence.
The rumor is Flat Out BS. Stop implying it is anything other than made-up BS.
Unless you have an source other than idle opinion and speculation on an internet forum?
No? Didn't think so.