Originally Posted by
Purple Drank
Were you here for the previous TA? You might need a better grasp of the issues. No pre- verification with a rolling 12 month lookback is a massive concession.
Virtual basing as described is basically a blank check. Will cost a lot of jobs.
There are a lot more issues that need to be explained before we know the true scope of these concessions. Speaking of scope, why wasn't it improved?
Please get up to speed and delve into it before mailing in your yes vote.
I now know we are in for huge gains because the language details will be crowd sourced by at least 13000 individuals. The NN has only been out for a few hours and its been dissected and reread by everyone on SM. The true test will be if management can continue to control the rhetoric around questionable TA language. It will take UPS+ rates to even have consideration of any untested open ended changes.