Originally Posted by casual observer

Here's how I look at virtual basing. Let me know where I'm wrong.

Basically, the company doesn't know where it wants to use some of its heavies (777). So, it spends a bunch of money deadheading pilots around and putting them up in hotels instead of risking the expense of starting a new pilot base that would have to be closed when marketing changes its mind.

Somebody in management comes up with the idea of virtual basing and they brainstorm up the idea to sell it to the pilot group as a flexible tool that will benefit the commuters living at these random bases (if they become virtual bases). Obviously (the logic would go), if you are commuter, you'd be better off taking a chance your home airport will become a virtual base - even if its unlikely - rather than take a pass and guarantee no commuting relief.

The goal would be, for example, to get a narrow body captain living in Dallas to support the idea, because he might benefit and would have nothing to lose. What would happen, however, is the company would have no intention of virtually basing narrow bodies, they only want to eliminate the credit time in select wide body categories. And those wide body pilots can already deviate with positive space and get paid the credit - a commuter's dream.

So, what would more likely happen with virtual basing is a senior wide body F/O living in Dallas now making less money would be motivated to upgrade and displace the junior narrow body Captain that thought he was rolling the dice on not having to commute.

Both pilots end up with a non-paid commute and less money.

That's why I think the company wants it.