Originally Posted by
HTBH
Anybody know how many of the AE positions are still vacant and to be filled?
And, I've got to ask the question: why are they still awarding 747 F/O positions? Look at the August reserve list on that thing compared to any narrowbody aircraft in NYC. Can we borrow some of these guys??? And that isn't a jab at 747 guys. If I could hold it, I would and gladly commute to reserve. But I don't understand the logic behind awarding that to people when they appear to have more reserves than they know what to do with, the summer months are over and the fleet is shrinking. Meanwhile...in narrowbody NYC land there isn't a single day of positive reserve coverage on the 717, M88, A320, or 757 (and just a handful on the 737 right at the minimum level). Again....not an attack on the widebody guys. I hope to be one of you someday. It just makes no sense to me why they underman NYC so much and keep adding bodies to fleets that seem to have plenty of bodies already. I'm hoping the 500 new hires coming July through October will help things out with some schedule flexibility and coverage.
They double down on 747 SC quite a bit and there are instances of SC guys not being there when needed. In the past year, we've got messages from the fleet detailing post- push turnarounds that needed to be recrewed and emails giving heads up to charters and other pending ops that might impact the reserve ranks; closing with a "seriously guys, no kidding, be in position for SC next week." Every flight out of DTW is four guys, so a timed out crew hits the reserve list hard. The financial fallout from a 747 cancellation due to insufficient crew is epic compared to a Mad Dog, so it seems there is no shyness in staffing the Whale. You could effectively divided available reserves by two for making a NB fleet comparison.