I honestly don't know if 6 year flow is attainable or not. I don't think anyone can honestly say, hence the bait. Lots of argument is based on the letter T deferrals. However, the question to ask is what was the flow doing BEFORE these guys started coming back to AA? That, I think, is an indicator as to what will most likely happen and will happen for any projection. So the way I see it, something has to change in order for this goal to be achieved. Also asking for change from AAG is like asking a lawyer for a pay cut.

The flow numbers have been consistent. However consistently off to meet the 6 year goal, according to math. My point is there has been opportunity to flow more to help meet this goal, yet corporation didn't do it. That is where some hatred stems from, promises have been made to the pilot group and were deliberately broken. Judge by what they do, not what they say.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk