Thread: The Surveys
View Single Post
Old 08-22-2016 | 03:07 AM
  #96  
deadseal
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 757
Likes: 0
From: systems analyst
Default

Originally Posted by Sink r8
Fair enough. The company needs to move more, and they're not jumping in with both feet, are they? I think they can definitely write a much bigger. Twhree reasons they don't: 1) they don't really have to yet, 2) time works in their favor, and 3) they have no assurances that the bigger check yields certainty of outcome anyway.

If the 12 didn't completely freeze up for three weeks before the soft park, they could have gotten more. If you can get 15-17 guys out of 19 send the NC in, saying 18/5/5, no PS changes, a little of this, a little of that, and we'll actually stand behind the TA, and sell you three years of bliss, I think the company would do it. Our problem is that we can't actually work together. You figure that with the 15-16 the 12 have, there would never have been an issue, yet here we are. All of it self-inflicted, none of it making sense.

So, yes, I agree that the company needs to come up more. I assume they're going to convince the mediator they're ready to continue serious negotiations, make serious movement.

Are we?
come on buddy.
You say this like the other guys had no input. That they were bystanders. Don't they share some of the responsibility? The 12 don't live in a vacuum. I'm sure the other guys behaved in a way to push them down that path. Why is united +1 no concessions of any kind so hard to comprehend?
Reply