Which indicates the severity of the concern. This minimal non-compliance could and should be very easily fixed with a small correction but the company refuses. (I may be an odd duck, but I'll vote to strike over this display of bad-faith early and often, it ****es me off)

Would we accept every pilot getting paid .5% less than our agreed rates? How about vacation being cut .5% short or .5% of crew meals being purposely not loaded? Why do we accept routine non-compliance with Section 1? What if we randomly no show'd for .5% of our duty in's? The point is, both we and the company demand compliance elsewhere. Why not scope?

It is not beyond the company's control.

Our MEC changed the policy manual section on the Scope Compliance & Analysis Chairman's job in June but I'm not sure the changes in the job's responsibilities have been implemented yet by the administration.