View Single Post
Old 09-04-2016 | 08:48 AM
  #8589  
Plane Ramrod's Avatar
Plane Ramrod
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,577
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lemon Jello
I keep going back and re-reading this petition, and I have a lot of problems with it. Some of my concerns are relatively minor, like the wording that says the MEC "will not accept nor ratify any new agreement". Its not that I believe our union overlords are going to deny the membership the right to ratify the TA, it just seems to suggest that the author either cobbled this thing together in a hurry or didn't take the time to familiarize him or herself with the process. Maybe I am splitting hairs, but c'est la vie.

My biggest concern about this petition is that it appears to me that its intent is to lock the MEC/NC into what may be an untenable negotiating position. It seems to be demanding "don't send us a TA to vote on unless it includes 100% retro pay to 08/01/15. Regardless of what the rest of the agreement looks like." This is a corner I would rather we did not paint ourselves into. Also, this petition demands everything of the union, nothing from the company. With the hope that down line it will provide a financial disincentive for the company to continue to drag feet. I think its possible that it could have the opposite effect in the end game. Do we really believe that a mediator is going to release us into self help because we have decided that any thing less than 100% retro in unsat, regardless of the rest of the package? I have my doubts.....

By the way, if this Hanna guy is not the author of this petition, I would certainly like to know who is. My experience has been whenever someone shoves a petition under your nose to sign for an ostensibly good cause, it helps to read the fine print and know who is actually sponsoring it. "Sign this petition to stop the slaughter of puppies and kittens!" Then you read on to page two and it has a provision for a $1000 per household tax and a 3 round magazine limit for your Glock, brought to you by the National Coalition to Confiscate All Firearms Now. (This was an intentional exaggeration to make a point, also known as hyperbole.)

Sorry, but I find this petition to be extremely flawed. I want a great contract sooner rather than later, and I am willing to strike to get it, but I cannot in good conscience sign a petition that comes across to me as a no confidence vote to our union leadership.
I just look at it as a way to share our collective 2 cents with the mec. I like the tough guy "demand" in the petition, but in reality it should say "hey mec, here are 250 members that would really, really like you to add this to the list." No member or group has the right to "demand" anything, short of having enough support to recall enough mec members to change policy. Let's face it, even if 1,400 pilots are willing to sign a toothless petition demanding something, most won't vote to recall their rep, and the threat of recall is all the leverage members have over their reps.

This petition is what it is... a paper tiger which may or may not show unity.