Originally Posted by RalphWiggum

It is flawed. As far as the source, from what Ive been told MH isn't well liked by many at this group and by few at his previous company. That says a lot.



Personal attacks aside, while Im sure the petition makes these 200+ people feel good it is a flawed way of trying to change things. It's the easy way out. It restricts the reps ability to vote on a TA that may be good for us based on a demand like this. I don't want my reps to ignore compensation, retirement, scheduling, scope, LTD etc etc based solely on retro pay. I do want our negotiators to get as much as possible from these dirtbags and spread it around the most equitable way possible. Just like I wouldn't want my reps to only care about pay rates at the expense of scheduling rules. Ive made that clear to them directly. We've had our say twice so far in pilot surveys. Its a frustrating process but I think we should see what happens this week and what happens over the next few months before making demands like this. If there isn't progress the way we want to see it or there is a turd of TA then we can react as necessary.