Originally Posted by
Qotsaautopilot
Lots of words here and I think most have stopped listening.
I will say that telling me someone was critical about the RAH MEC and NC doesn't exactly make me think that person is crazy. If a leadership group cannot either secure a RATIFIABLE agreement or get released in a seven year period I'd say deserves a major amount of criticism. That's not a conspiracy theory.
I don't know any on either side this senseless argument just making an observation. Having Kiwi as a prime supporter I think discredits someone more.
My guess is that anything that may or may not have happened at Duffys probably had both sides at fault. Both sides are passionate but there are always three sides to a story, one being the truth.
You are right, I will stop entertaining these trolls.
I want to point out earlier someone commented on why the petition was aimed at the MEC and not management. The reason we have to go this route is that when this becomes a resolution we can require management to give us ponies, but it has no teeth. The MEC must ratify any agreement the NC hands to them before it reaches the pilot group for a vote, they are the firewall. By requiring any contract to contain retro before it is ratifiable by the MEC in turn requires management to agree to it. It might seem like semantics, but legally we wanted to make sure the petition could be turned into a word for word resolution and not change anything. If we changed wording when it goes to resolution it may cause some who supported the petition to back out, or the naysayers will use that as ammo to shoot it down, claiming that was not what the petition was for. Basically just making sure that the petition mirrors any resolution and keep the message as transparent as possible.
https://www.change.org/p/spa-mec-dem...irit-airlines?