Originally Posted by
trustbutverify
Again, I fail to see what we get for the large RJ give. You're saying the company will let us keep the profit sharing ALREADY IN PLACE for more large RJs. That makes no sense - we don't have to give up something we already have if we're willing to give up something in another area? What? How is that a gain for us again?
The reason 30 more large RJs from C2012 haven't hurt us is because the company can't seem to get rid of the 50's fast enough. C2012 has nothing to do with that.
If C2012 had nothing to do with that, again I ask, why the difference in movement with AA vs UAL and Delta? Why are the Legacies that implemented Scope Choke rapidly expanding while the legacy that didn't is shrinking? AA has 600 regional airframes and many 50 seaters. Delta has 425 and this proposal takes it down to 350 in the next 4 years. Why the difference?