Scope NN and the FAQ are misleading (to be nice about it, lying to not be so nice). There is one example.

Failing to disclose other concessions in the NN while they touted pay rates could be seen as another. I could go through each NN and compare it to the section of the contract, but hopefully a well-written con paper will do that. If not, I promise to come back and try to do my best.

Keep up the accusations that this is some sort of conspiracy. I am a regular line pilot that pays dues and occasionally emails my reps to express my POV. I have a lot of years left here, and I do not want to sell scope and QOL for industry-standard wages. You are free to disagree. All I ask is that you actually engage in debate or discourse instead of just saying that because I think this is a bad deal for us that I must have some ulterior motive.