Originally Posted by
Gunga Din
NTSB published their finding on a corporate crash and after reading it I can't help but think the NTSB would say very similar things if we ever had a mishap.
"Execuflight has a “check-the-box approach,” NTSB concluded. They may have followed regulations, NTSB board members said, but not with the necessary thoroughness."
I know we are battling for a TA but can anyone say if there is any appetite for pressuring the company for better training for new hires and recurrent?
What is your definition of better recurrent training?
Longer modules for the EFB training for recurrent?
Longer oral exams?
More limitation and memory items for PCs?
Ground School exams in which the Riddle kids get to write themselves and not have them tempered down after someone with realistic standards looks at the exam?
Slippery slope right there....
Would you like PTs for FOs every 6 months, like it is with CAs?
Would it be nice to try some new things on the warm up sim, yeah. Will that change our training or other standard/AQP airline training from a "check the box" training environment, I dont think so.