Originally Posted by
C11DCA
The problem of the size (usually as determined by MTOW weight) and speed pay equation is modern technology.
Same or larger planes now weigh less then their predecessors. See A350-1000 vs 777-300er. The Airbus has a 94,000 lb lighter MTOW for the same dimension aircraft. So consideration of capabilities beyond just size need to be factored in.
I don't have an issue with pay banding, if the bands actually made sense. In my ideal world, if banding were used:
Super Jumbos (A380/747-8i class)
Large Widebodies (777/787/A350)
Small Widebodies (767 all variants)
Large narrowbody (757-200 and -300/A321)
Medium narrowbody (all 737, all 320, C series etc)
Small narrowbody (anything smaller then above)
787 seats only six more pax than the 767-300, and fewer seats than the 767-400. Why not band the 767 up?