Thread: Kill VB
View Single Post
Old 11-01-2016 | 05:59 AM
  #11  
brakechatter's Avatar
brakechatter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 435
Likes: 16
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
Mike, I respect your sincerity but you are just making up a scenario. It might be plausible or it might not ever happen or anything remotely close.

I don't commute but used to. The VBs are a huge unknown but I'm not convinced they are toxic. I am suspicious of them but our contractual language gives us an easy out if we don't like them. We should allow them to proceed and see what unfolds.

The company might conclude that they are a waste of time and effort. We might feel the same. Either side can pull them down.

Or just maybe, both sides will find them beneficial. It might even be (or not) several years of very successful VBs later we might even ask "what was all the angst about?"
Yes, they are a "huge unknown", and that is what makes them toxic. Nothing in the contract should be a "huge unknown".

..and yes, they do abrogate seniority. For the very reason that you must be qualified on the equipment that goes to a VB, it is an abrogation of seniority.

Pull them down immediately.
Reply