Old 12-05-2016 | 09:30 AM
  #168  
NEDude's Avatar
NEDude
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SayAlt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
v






Right or wrong, no one here is interested in you defending flag-of-convenience in this forum. Stop it.
I don't really care if you like it or not.

The labour protections are spelled out in Article 17 bis. It specifically states that a company cannot use a provision of the treaty to reduce labour standards. So please, tell me which provision of the Open Skies treaty did they use? Has ALPA named the provision?

I am also flabbergasted that anyone finds the argument that they are using flag of convenience to violate EU labour standards by using an AOC in an EU country that complies with EU laws and is a party to the Open Skies treaty, a sane argument.


So please, for the love of God, tell me which provision of the Open Skies treaty did they use to violate Article 17 bis. And please tell me how they are getting around EU labour laws by using an EU based AOC in a country that complies with EU labour laws and is a party to the Open Skies treaty.
Reply