Thread: t/a passed
View Single Post
Old 12-05-2016 | 06:46 PM
  #96  
notEnuf's Avatar
notEnuf
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,239
Likes: 687
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
You don't think they know completely?

They play chess, remember?

I think we need to stop assuming that Delta is just doing things off the cuff, just to screw us. They might screw us. But, it's not off the cuff and just like in the Godfather, it's not personal. As in, they aren't doing it just because they can.

Keep in mind that one of the things Delta needs is increased productivity (Ie., they need us to fly more.) That was readily apparent from where I was sitting last summer. If you don't know what I mean, go to JFK/LGA/or ATL in the summer time when thunderstorms are passing through -- which is just about every day.

If I were to guess, to figure out what Delta want's with these VB's, we should look no further than what they do with some of the flight attendants.

As you know, we have FA's bases in MCO, FLL/MIA, SAN, and maybe a few more places (TPA?). If you talk to the FA's that are based there, you will find that they are fairly senior, that they are probably flying a pretty crappy one day/4 leg trip, and that they almost never call in sick -- especially not late notice.

There's probably a few reasons for this: One, who doesn't want to fly from home? Two, who doesn't want to fly one day trips so you can be home every night -- even if it's a crappy 4 leg day? Finally, who calls in sick, when you personally know the reserve they will call out and might see them in the grocery store later that week?

I bet those senior flight attendants in those bases, are some of the most reliable FA's in the system -- at least that's the feeling I get.

If that's true, I bet Delta knows it and would love to set up VB's where we have a lot of pilots who commute to try to set up the same dynamic. Ie., I think it's probably an attempt to set up less sick calls.

I'd look for them to set up VB's in some of the same places they have unusual flight attendant bases. I'd also guess that they would set them up to do the same kind of 2-4 leg day's in and out of ATL/DTW/MSP/JFK's that the flight attendants do.

Like I said, it's just a guess and I like to play chess, too.
We agree they probably are seeking productivity, however VBs also provide flexible basing at no real cost. That will be exploited, and once they are on to something beneficial no matter what it is, they will expand it.

The fact that I don't know what that might be right now makes it an even more nebulous threat. (yes, I mean to QOL) Shut down VBs and this is a non issue for the next negotiation. Commuters gotta commute, sorry but that's the way I see it. Saves jobs and keeps the flying in base.

I only play chess against my 7 year old... because I can beat him, most of the time. If he gets better than me, the board goes back on the top shelf. Same with management. Why play their game when you know they are better at it? The sooner VBs are put back on the shelf, the better.

Last edited by notEnuf; 12-05-2016 at 06:58 PM.
Reply