View Single Post
Old 12-17-2016 | 09:51 AM
  #17  
Captain Beaker
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JohnBurke
No captain, it's not.

You didn't read your material very well, because it undermined your effort; it said the exact opposite of what you attempted to say, as noted above.
Not much point is providing further references if you ignore the one already provided



Here it is again with a better pic. Take two props both with a 30 degree blade angle, one stationary, one wind milling, the wind milling prop has a drag coefficient 50% less!

The drag created by a propeller is a function of the local airspeed over the blade and the relative angle of attack of the blade.

When a propeller windmills the relative angle of attack is reversed, flat pitches typically results in a high angle of attack and high local airspeed, i.e the propeller does a lot of work, and drag on the aircraft is very high.

The engine/gearbox is a red herring because it is not the cause. A free wheeling propeller with no engine/gearbox slowing it down and a very flat pitch will result in a very high drag coefficient, many multiples higher than a stationary one of the same pitch. A feathered propeller will have the far less drag than both these two scenarios.

John with respect I am not arguing with the rest of your post.

Last edited by Captain Beaker; 12-17-2016 at 10:23 AM.
Reply