Originally Posted by
notEnuf
...so wiggle room lower on both the TAJV percentage and GBHs.
No, absolutely wrong.
Did you even read the contract?
TAJV required % went down. (It should be pointed out the TAJV measurement period was shortened in our favor too)
The GBH were
established for the first time. There was no contractural lowering of GBH.
There is no "both" of lowering here.