Originally Posted by
Karnak
Can anybody who was there shed some light on the discussion? Was the recall based upon the TA vote? The MEC chairman vote?
Both of those would be seriously stupid reasons to recall a rep. Recalls should only be based on misconduct or failure to do the job. Was there any of that mentioned?
Stated reasons? The TA vote was not included in the resolution; the MEC chairman vote was. There were also additional "reasons" cited that boil down to "not doing the job." (No evidence of that point presented, simply a statement in the resolution.)
Real reasons? Doesn't take much reading between the lines: get the guys who aren't falling in line out ASAP, then once the "old guard" (not my phrase, but pretty accurate) is back in majority, remove BB & put their own guy in.
As another poster has said: Pathetic. And, to quote a speaker at the meeting: "The company is laughing at us."