Originally Posted by
Karnak
That's too bad. Recalls without a "cause" that can be documented and passes the smell test are dumb.
Wait a minute. Are you saying that the "new guard" are more enlightened than the "old guard"?
[...]
Circling back to the C44 recall effort, it doesn't appear to be based upon any specific malfeasance or behavior. That's bad.
Not saying that at all re "new guard" vs "old guard." You've answered the question with the first & last statements I quoted.
While I suppose it's obvious which side I'm on, I told Jimmy directly at the meeting that even if I thought he (& Chris) was the worst rep ever, I would still vote against the recall because it's an improper exercise of a very important membership check on reps. That opinion was solidified with recall motions utterly lacking in substance.