Originally Posted by
Karnak
Thanks. That clears it up. I was concerned that personal perspectives about the process of ratification, or the merits of the two TA's was clouding the issue. Some seem to be letting it do just that.
If it was ok to recall reps in 2015 for their vote, then it's ok to recall reps this year for their vote.
There are indications the votes themselves were not the sole reasons for seeking recall in C44.
So, those who screamed that it was wrong to recall in 2015, now say it's ok because?? Their morals changed since then? Two wrongs make a right? Or, they were just pretending to have morals?
Pick one. I'm pretty sure those are the only options.