Originally Posted by
Karnak
If they justify one, but not the other, then they're being weasels.
Do you know anyone who tries to justify the recalls in 2015, but not these?
My personal opinion is both are wrong if they are based solely upon votes for/against a TA or a chairman. There needs to be some failure of representation to trigger a recall.
TA1 almost cost us $1B or more. This Chairman election doesn't appear to be costing anyone (except the pro-recalls some FPL).