Ok, so you're rationalizing the previous recalls based upon the TA vote, but not this batch. You're arguing that the two situations are NOT the same. Correct?

Here's what someone wrote on this thread: "So, those who screamed that it was wrong to recall in 2015, now say it's ok because?? Their morals changed since then?"

Maybe we should acknowledge that both situations are subject to individual interpretations, and aren't a good target for blanket generalizations. So whoever wrote about "morals changing" should consider that they too practice "Yeah, but" logic depending upon their personal opinion. The alternative is the changing morals thingy.