View Single Post
Old 02-02-2017 | 10:18 AM
  #19  
Chuck D
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 740
Likes: 19
Default

Originally Posted by jsled
But the cs3-hundo does not qualify as a 'New Small Narrowbody Aircraft' in the UPA. So the Company could not get more of it's coveted 76 seaters. Which means it's prolly not gonna happen.
I've wondered about this. How much does the CO actually want to access more 76 seaters with the current trends at the regionals WRT reliability of operations and availability of a steady stream of pilots? We seem to be running 99%+ completion factor lately and that's normally pretty tough/impossible to do regularly at most regionals. Would the CS300 make sense anyways (more sense than that initial plan of grabbing the last 60-odd small old-gen 737s off the line), even if it didn't open up access to the 76 seaters?

Or separately, would a combo of the CS100 and 300 make sense to both open up the 76 seat access and go forward w/ the most fuel efficient aircraft in the low-mid 100 seat range?
Reply