View Single Post
Old 02-03-2017 | 07:37 AM
  #35  
Bluesky1
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by awax
Unless it was an slam dunk opportunity for either campaign to take easy and immediate action. Setting the stage for either to pick the low hanging fruit so to speak and take credit for standing up for the American worker.

Trump has every impetus to reverse the application, I can hear the sound bites now "We reversed the action of a secret muslim who was a total disaster and today we continue to make America great again".

For Clinton, the rhetoric would be toned down, but still an easy win to appear pro-worker.

With respect to today's reality, it's going to be all-telling to see if he walks the walk or is just another windbag politician.
The majority of Trumps cabinet are business leaders. Ask yourself if you think these CEO's are pro union or not? (Boeing moved a plant to SC to get around their Union) for example. What they say on camera is one thing, but what they truly want to "compete" is another.
Reply