Thread: Envoy
View Single Post
Old 02-10-2017 | 05:53 AM
  #869  
Pedro4President
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cr700
35 pilots have been selected for flow. AAG could have easily selected zero since we already have over 60 in the pool now. They may not flow exactly 35 but it's very possible this could happen.

Just immediately discounting the selection of 35 is degrading to the process. Comments such as, selecting 35 is a lot different than actually flowing 35. It's obvious that AAG is honoring the flow above and beyond what is required.

Why so negative? Who have you been flying with that has turned you against the company? It's obvious that your outlook has changed in looking at your posts last year. You, in fact, were calling out people who were deriding the company at one time.
I am "deriding" anyone who spreads lies about the state of the company. Including the lies you spread.

The "selecting" process has no bearing on actual flow. It isn't a positive or negative metric. It's just an arbitrary step in the flow process.

Restricting the flow while offering zero time lines last year is going above and beyond the flow? I don't think so. Yes the company did flow more during the summer due to the furloughed pilots.

I'm negative? The only time anyone on here chimed in about this topic was when someone assumed AAG was flowing 35 pilots in February. I simply stated we don't know how many pilots will go to class in February. Others just stated that selecting vs flowing are to different terms.
Reply