Originally Posted by pugpilot

I am the lawyer. I'm the person who is the expert. I am the person who is paid to NOT have an opinion, but to actually know what he is talking about. And when I don't know what I'm talking about, I have the professional obligation and fiduciary responsibility to say so and send a client to an expert in that particular field.



What did I put in my supporting information that was an opinion?

Public financial statement from BH - not an opinion

Summation of legal precedents - not an opinion (courts don't have opinions, the have rulings)



I did not say a single thing about NJA operations, their future, or business plans.

My singular contention is that you are UNIQUELY unqualified at identifying a successful business model for NetJets. The reason being is your limited business qualifications in food service make just experienced enough that you think your voice should be heard.

The pilots who keep their mouths shut show more intelligence by just doing their job than an upjumped burger-flipper who is over his head.



Of the ~2500 pilots on property, yours is the opinion I would value the least concerning the future of NetJets.