Originally Posted by
757Driver
That LCAL mindset you speak of produced the best scope language in the industry. No 50+ seat jets ever. Wonder why we collectively dropped that ball together?
As a LCAL pilot I disagree 100% with your statenent on CAL Scope. What happened after 9/11? CAL parked the DC-10's, MD80's and CAL Express exploded. There was a limit to 59 seat jets but it was very high, close to 300 I recall. Our scope clause was pathetic.
Our current scope clause is industry leading. It's not about seats, it's about protecting mainline pilot jobs. With our scope choke the only way they grow beyond our current 70/76 RJ flying levels is with mainline growth. As a percentage UAL today has far less RJ flying as a percentage of mainline size then CAL post 9/11. Additionally CAL had no mainline single isle block hour ratios like in our contract, or clauses to remove RJ seats if mainline furloughs.
Unlike what happened to CAL post 9/11, if UAL shrinks today then UAL Express flying shrinks.