Originally Posted by
StoneQOLdCrazy
Karnak, are you in the current administration? Serious question.
No. I'm a generic line pilot.
Originally Posted by
StoneQOLdCrazy
For years you have sought always to defend and justify the most ridiculous, concessionary, and harmful contractual language by painting anyone who disagrees with it as a lying and/or cheating scumbag.
I'm flattered that you've been reading. I'm also concerned that you haven't been reading for comprehension. If you'd like to make me the subject of discussion, you could start a thread.
Originally Posted by
StoneQOLdCrazy
Were you in contract admin and communications? What is your current position?
Seated, watching SportsCenter. And "no" to the first question.
Originally Posted by
StoneQOLdCrazy
Being forced to go to a doctor much more frequently is most certainly an erosion of a benefit for professionals and grown-ups.
A comment on the actual topic? It's a good first step!
I don't see verification requirements as an erosion of the benefit. As I've posted on this thread, I think it's an attempt to make that process a pain in the butt for some. I don't think it'll work.
That's my perspective. Your's might be different. That's a good thing. The
ad hominem stuff in your post is not a good thing. Ironic that you cited "
grown-ups" in your post, eh?