Originally Posted by
gloopy
This is all theoretical and AFAIK untested. The real issue is what happens when they're going after someone because of their sick use, and the only note the person can get is a "nothing is wrong with this person at this time". Then what?
Are we 100% sure there's nothing they can do about that? If so, where is it written, and/or where are the test case/precedents to prove it?
Perhaps Karnak will be one of the small percentage that ends up in the verification spiral. The company denied quite a few verifications under the old system. Karma can be a *****!