Originally Posted by
Gunter
I don't think the company wants to lock out the over 60 crowd with a huge bid right before age 65 becomes law.
.
Gunter,
Wouldn't moving folks from the back seat into a front seat cause a similar "reverse" training cycle? Then you get into the costs of moving your lowest paid (less than 15 year) people out and replacing them with your highest paid (more than 15 years). Additionally, if you can keep these folks at the panel, not only do you get them cheaper, but you also cut into the number of years you will pay them a retirement...a definite win/win for the company.
The only thing I am sure of is that the company has costed this out and already know their plan of action....we'll find out eventually.