Originally Posted by Iceberg

I don't know why you think I'm arguing that with you. My entire point was that your view was contested by another poster and you backed up your opinion by stating it was "well known". He asked you for any numbers and you responded with sarcasm and a lack of backup. I called you out for it and you continued the same way. I happen to agree that at 250 hours a mil guy is probably better. I also agree that in the long run it's probably a wash. All I wanted was for you to back your claims up. You didn't or couldn't. I guess your claims are facts because you made them. The world is flat, by the way, ask Kyrie Irving.