Originally Posted by
MasterOfPuppets
Just for the heck of it I ran the results and #2 retires in JUN, #10 retires in AUG and #11 retires in JUN.
Am I wrong in thinking 3 more CAs should have been awarded?
I think the more pertinent question is "if they were replaced on a previous bid, why still show them"? I don't know. But they aren't removing them for the next bid on a 1-for-1 as they retire.