Actually that does help me understand. Thanks for taking the time to explain it again.
i imagine if we give the notice and get rid of this MOU then we would be back to not being able to trade at all due to "inadequate reserve coverage". So while it is annoying to not be able to trade for a trip more than 4 hours out, at least we are able to trade for a trip within 4 hours. Makes sense.
Originally Posted by
Arctichicken
Re-read my post. You must've not been on the property when this MOU was signed. As I've said, this MOU was originally created to allow more trades as crew scheduling/emaestro was denying trip trades solely based on lack of reserve coverage. Believe it or not, it was an improvement at the time. With Crew NoAcces, the company is using it in their advantage and misapplying the MOU to deny trip trades. Capiche?