Originally Posted by
Eject
So, you think it would be foolish to stay with AA if that meant living in base and not having to commute to a UAL base for the next 25 years? Seems like a rather rational decision, considering an anticipated flow date within 4 months, not to mention the higher percentage of mandatory retirements at AA Vs. UAL/DL over the next 15 years.
So, it's more rational to give up hundreds of seniority numbers, because base? How about something happening that would stop everything in its tracks, and furloughs begin. Someone gets to still remain employed, and someone else
one number below him gets to be homebased for many years.
But nothing could go wrong, right?