Thread: Union response
View Single Post
Old 05-09-2017 | 09:23 AM
  #11  
putzin
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,600
Likes: 33
Default

Originally Posted by FAULTPUSH
...and therein lies the irony. The %#tards that advocate this work action are playing into the company's hands. THEY are the ones who are delaying getting a new CBA, which is EXACTLY what the company wants.

But hell, if it makes you feel like you're sticking it to the man, go right ahead.
You are 100% wrong.

You cant delay something that wasn't really moving forward in the first place. We are still miles and miles apart (1.1 billionish) and there will be little to no difference in the time frame. That's the beauty in this debacle.

Besides that, this is nothing more than people tired of working on their day off for 70% less than industry standard. This problem is company created, exacerbated by bob and his big mouth, and now the company has to live with it.

I don't care what an injunction would say or how much the union pleads, I still wont be working on MY day off for far less than my peers make. This isn't a sick out or slow taxing intentionally harming the company. This is simply not working more than I have to, enjoying MY time off.

It's not a job action, it's common sense. But by all means, please feel free to ULCC yourself out, no questions asked.

Last edited by putzin; 05-09-2017 at 09:35 AM.
Reply