View Single Post
Old 05-11-2017 | 10:43 AM
  #11  
notEnuf's Avatar
notEnuf
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,332
Likes: 821
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by Tailhookah
I never have nor never will vote YES to any TA that has us "swapping or trading" profit sharing for pay rates. To do would show extreme ignorance not only of the mindset of big business but of history.

If we were to swap 1/2 of our profit sharing for rates the following would happen. We would originally see a little bigger bump in pay rates that would smooth out to neutral (if we hadn't swapped) by the end of the contract. Then when the next TA was negotiated we'd be at ground zero on pay rates and negotiating vs. our peers at the "neutral" rate.

In essence we'd see a small one time boost for that first year at best or better $$$ as a result. Then we'd be gauged and compared against industry average... now we have those rates at or slightly better than our peers PLUS profit sharing.

I'll never vote YES to any contract that cuts profit sharing. Don't fall for it.

Tail
And if you take the argument to the other extreme...

This is a built in cost reduction during a loss, which makes it easier to recover to a profit. If we were ever to go through another bankruptcy and have profit sharing, the carrot would have to be more PS not just getting some back.
Reply