Originally Posted by
bay982
There is a basic logic problem with your thought on the Harvard study though: negative coverage does not necessarily mean bias. You would agree, I think, that Kim Kardashian deserved 80% negative coverage, and that media isn't being unfair to her.
Based on Trump's honestly, behavior, and promises versus accomplishments in his first 100 days, I think you might agree that it might be entirely possible that his 'grade' compared to past presidents, both Democratic and Republican, is far far lower, warranting only 20% positive coverage.
A presidency is 1460 days long. Forget the 100 day marker. In terms of border security, economy and deregulation he has accomplished more than BHO did in 8 years. The main stream media doesn't cover any of it.