Originally Posted by
TonyWilliams
I've flown more than 3 different -900 out of SLC.
JetJoke seems to make it up as he goes along. He made the same BS statistics for how many ASA -200's we have at SkyWest (he was wrong, by the way), like he had his nose jammed up Jerry's posterior.
WOW, dwelling are we? What ever happened to your "class?" Talk to Mgmnt and get the facts yourself or maybe learn how to use the internet for something other than this forum and porn surfing. BTW, do you actually think our 900’s can't fly in both SLC and ATL in the same day or that SKW won’t use a 900 on a 700 route or a 200 on a 700 route? BTW, I've flown all 17 of our CR9's here in ATL but that doesn't mean anything. Prior to being ATL based I was also based in SLC; no that means anything as well.
We have 17 and they flow between the two cities regularly with the majority being in ALT, regardless of where they are based on paper. After all, do we really think we have any RJ's based in PSP, FAT, SMF, SBA, TUS or any of the other out stations? No, they are based in SLC, DEN, LAX, SFO and ORD; those are just locations were it makes sense to have a pilot & Mx domicile due to RON's. Do you really think that the CR2's & 7's bases in ORD never make it to DEN, LAX or SFO?
You’re a bright guy, think about it. What's on paper doesn't mean jack after we sign the contract with "Mainline." That is, as long as we fulfill our end they don't care which domiciles a/c we use or if it's a CR7 or CR2 (scope removed). They just want it to launch with their PAX on board.