Originally Posted by
bay982
You're missing the point. No one on this forum is qualified to make a claim regarding climate change.
It is akin to a non-pilot telling 97% of pilots they're flying wrong.
Which is why we rely on scientists.
So if you say it isn't happening, the only way to support your argument is to provide links to scientific research, in the form of peer-reviewed studies. Or some concrete evidence of a conspiracy on the part of hundreds of scientific organizations.
In decades worth of following the subject I've seen not a single piece of well-researched evidence of either.
The onus is on folks who do not want to listen to the scientific consensus.
Or, they can admit, which I'm coming to believe is a more honest truth, that they don't really care whether the climate is changing because of human activity.
Actually, I'm qualified, my degree is in engineering, and statistics, so I know when someone is lying to me mathematically. Also, I'm more qualified than Bill Nye.
But for you, explain why a settled science has models, where almost all are horribly dead wrong. If you flew an ILS, and when you broke out at DH, you were 6 miles off the runway, would you say it's settled that the ILS is accurate?
