Originally Posted by
Sanchez
Absolutely.
Mr. Toilet, let me be clear here seeing as somany need it spelled out.
IF YOU BELIEVE THAT CAL SHOULD GIVE UP SCOPE CLAUSE, THEN YOU ARE NO DIFFERENT THAN A gojets PILOT.
Now, if you fly a 70-90 seater, which rightfully has always been at mainline (up 'til the 90's), and you're ok with getting paid 50 seater rates for it, or you just simply don't see how it has diminished the flying at the legacies, then shame on you.
And if you believe your actions do not impact everyone's career, then most definitely...shame on you.
Can't get anymore clear than this!
Show where ANYONE EVER on this forum has said CAL should give up scope. Just one place EVER out of ALL the members. I have no idea who you'd be directing your statements at. They seem very obvious and random. I love it when you guys say things like "you're ok with getting paid 50 seater rates for it". Who would that be exactly? Then I'd like to see your proof of where the pay is out of line and why. Don't simply cry and shout "There should be more". Hell we'd all like 6 figures. Show me where something is slumped then show me where it should be. I've already made a comparison of several aircraft for several airlines at 10yr CA pay. Even graphed it and showed how things were right where they should be. Showed that for the pay to be increased per seat/hr the mainlines would have to start raising their pay first. Your blind rant is noted.