View Single Post
Old 07-14-2017, 02:35 PM
  #1  
Shortfall2105
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 13
Default Settlement Agreement Reached with ALPA

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT REACHED WITH ALPA


The four named plaintiffs in Valdez v. ALPA reached a Settlement Agreement with ALPA National on May 12, 2017, and pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure all differences are fully resolved and the lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice on May 15, 2017.

We cannot comment further on the Settlement Agreement other than to state this was not the ultimate result we had worked for countless hours and months to achieve, and we believe it was in the best interests of the contributors and FedEx pilot group we strove to represent. We believe in the end ALPA now knows its members are watching.

On June 12, 2017, we announced on FedEx Pilots v. ALPA that a Settlement Agreement had been reached will ALPA National and that a statement from the plaintiffs would follow.

On June 20, 2017, the FDX/ALPA MEC published a statement about the Settlement:

Plaintiffs -- 4 FedEx pilots -- claimed that ALPA made misrepresentations regarding certain aspects of the CBA and that without them, the CBA would not have been ratified. ALPA has denied those allegations and believes them to be without merit.

The District Court determined that the case could not proceed as a class action, leaving the suit between only the four plaintiffs and ALPA. The Court of Appeals refused to consider an appeal from that decision denying class certification.

ALPA believes that it has strong defenses to the claims of the four plaintiffs, but has determined that further litigation at this stage would entail considerable time and resources better spent on more important issues: focusing on moving forward to best protect and enhance the interests and concerns of the pilot group.

We will not comment on the FDX/ALPA MEC’s statement, but we will clarify that the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals denied our petition for immediate review of the denial of class certification, but did not deny our right to appeal the class certification after final judgement. The Sixth Circuit stated in their denial order:

"The plaintiffs have not demonstrated that the posture of the case supports an immediate appeal or that the denial of class certification cannot be reviewed on appeal from a final judgment."



A concurrent DFR lawsuit against ALPA, filed by former Continental pilots in 2014, was decided by Summary Judgement in July 2016 in ALPA’s favor.



Civil Action No. H-14-0451. | CARR v. AIRLINE... | Leagle.com

We also believe many FedEx pilots have become "disconnected" from the union and more involvement is vitally needed in the future in order for FedEx pilots to achieve an industry leading contract in all sections.

LAWSUIT RECAP


April 19, 2016: Four named plaintiffs file a Class Action Complaint in the Western District of Tennessee against ALPA for its alleged breaches of Duty of Fair Representation in connection with the ratification of the 2015 Tentative Agreement.

June 13, 2016: ALPA responds to Complaint.

July 12, 2016: Plaintiffs file Motion for Class Certification.

August 30 - September 1, 2016: Four named Plaintiffs are deposed by ALPA National in St. Louis, Missouri.

September 1, 2016: Plaintiffs complete delivery of their discovery documents to ALPA, which includes voice recordings, emails, text messages, social media posts and other documents.

October 18, 2016: Telephonic hearing for Class Certification held with Judge McCalla. ALPA opposes Class Certification.

December 14, 2016: Plaintiffs file Motion to "Stay" and discovery stops. Plaintiffs never depose any of the 15 ALPA witnesses or receive full discovery, which must include “all electronic materials, whether on ALPA or non-ALPA computers, cell phones, PDA’s, thumb drives, email servers, or other data storage devices” in accordance with ALPA’s Document Management Program.

January 9, 2017: Judge McCalla denies Class Certification, citing in part:

• Three of the named plaintiffs are not suitable class representatives because they voted “No” and thus were not affected by the alleged misrepresentations, and

• The damages are substantial enough that pilots can sue ALPA individually (The statute of limitations for pilots to sue ALPA “individually” had expired on April 20, 2016, and any pilot desiring to sue ALPA would have had to join our lawsuit).

January 24, 2017: Named plaintiffs petition the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals for permission to appeal the Class Certification Denial Order.

March 23, 2017: The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals denies plaintiffs’ petition for permission for immediate appeal of Class certification, but also states the denial of class certification can still be "reviewed on appeal from a final judgement."

• The lawsuit continues active with only the four named plaintiffs.

April 11, 2017: A new trial date is set for July 29, 2018.

May 12, 2017: The four named plaintiffs reach a Settlement Agreement with ALPA National.

May 15, 2017: Judgement of Dismissal with Prejudice signed by Judge McCalla.

Sincerely,

Stephen Valdez
Jeffrey Ware
Ruben Freyre
Armando Castroverde
Shortfall2105 is offline