Originally Posted by
Fdxlag2
I think the argument is: If it costs $4 to improve pensions $1 ...
It's an interesting narrative -- it costs The Company $3 for every $1 in Defined Benefit -- and even more interesting how it was planted and propagated.
The question is, is it true? I hope a few pennies of the retirement research effort have been directed towards validating or discounting this claim. I suspect it is a dubious claim.
.