View Single Post
Old 10-03-2007, 11:57 AM
  #6  
rickair7777
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,293
Default

Originally Posted by jsfBoat View Post
I'm glad that Boeing is doing this. I'm very concerened about the envrionmental future, but i'd hate to see aviation the last ones to develop this wonderful technology. I don't want my kids, and future grandkids to suffer the consequences of OUR actions towards the environment, but still want to see aviation have a strong position in the world's economic, and technological area.
Don't get too excited...bio jet fuel is slightly cleaner than petroleum based kerosene (due to fewer contaminants), but fundamentally it is pretty much a very similar chemical mixture. It is just produced by a different process. If it weren't similar, it would not work in our current aircraft...they are designed for fuel with a very specific set of properties. Anything too different won't work, for a wide variety of reasons. I think the biofuel does have less energy density, which means shorter range.

The big advantage to bio-fuel is you can get it from some nice folks in Nebraska...no need to sup with screaming, psychotic, arab fanatics.

Last edited by rickair7777; 10-03-2007 at 12:02 PM.
rickair7777 is offline