yeah LL training with undergraduate students in bona fide mountain routes is no joke. The NAVY does appear to have a different philosophy on hull loss risk than the AF when it comes to AETC/NATRACOM side of things, carrier training and overwater ops being the big divergence imo. Remind me again why the Navy went with single engine for their adv strike trainer? Seems peculiar considering the bulk of tailhook follow-on are multi-engine.
ETA: sorry posted before I saw rickair reply wrt 2 v 1 engines.