Originally Posted by
AllenAllert
None of it is wrong. You want to quote law when you don’t care to look at motive. It was both the non-scabs and scabs that requested a certification vote to protect what was stolen. Thus, the non-scabs voted to allow the SCABS into ALPA on their shirttails.
The merger is not that old, have you forgotten the JS and JP deals that delayed integration, contract and weakened ALPA on the property. I’m proud to say that post all that, good people took hold of the combined ALPA gaining us a good contract and an organization that will enforce it much as it existed at pre-merger UAL
I’m kinda curious, why do many CAL types need to defend the action of their SCABS?
Gibberish. If you want a union you have to let everyone in. The rest is some weird mental gymnastics you're doing and as usual you sound looney.
I'm not here posting about right or wrong or mergers or who's side is better, just clarifying how all the scabs got into alpa in the first place.