Originally Posted by
ORDinary
It is only my opinion, but I don't think at this point there should be any trade-offs. Any contract change should be the company giving to us, for nothing in return. Everything should be a no vote unless it is given to us for free. This company has shown over and over again that they will not offer improvements unless they feel they need to. And if they need the improvements, then we don't have to pay for them. If they need the improvements to guarantee staffing, then let them give us the improvements for nothing in return.
Yep. Too many times grabbing from the cookie jar. This is what happens when you don’t honor agreements made. The plaintiffs just adapt and any further trash sent to them gets immediately thrown out because you now have zero credibility with said people.
In my opinion the simplest way for them to heal their credibility issues is to stop the damn metering and start recruiting by their own successes from within.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro