Originally Posted by
FLYBOYMATTHEW
We haven't been offered anywhere near industry standard pay rates, retirement, insurance, job protections, etc, so why should we consider concessionary scheduling language that would allow the company to fly us more, give us less days off, eliminate soft time, and continue to build inefficient schedules while reducing the staffing need?
Right, you are still thinking in terms what we HAVE been offered. Hence why the union turned it down and rightfully so. This is why the union after the polling said that it would be open to go back to the negotiation table with PBS, but only if our contractual demands are met and pay scales go way up.