View Single Post
Old 11-19-2017 | 07:19 AM
  #20  
Macjet
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 24
From: Airplanes
Default

Originally Posted by balakay
Looking objectively, it appears there are really two sets of numbers that "should" be discussed. But as said earlier, and this is the way I have always heard it: "statistics lie and liars use statistics." The problem I'm seeing (and please correct me if I'm wrong) is that we are using numbers muddled together. What should be, IMO, is two sets: What is the new hire attrition, and overall attrition.

If you are using a number for the amount of people being hired with a total number of people leaving (overall), that's where there the percentage is askew. I would want to know for all of the new hires (those still under a year seniority), how many of those have left within that same time period of within one year. That may paint a different picture as to is this place an intermediary stop before going to the legacy carriers (or SWA). JMHO
I think you're absolutely correct along side with knowing our completion factor. I don't think our union has released a sufficient breakdown to know what the new hire (<365 days) attrition rate is. I would suspect that it is pretty high but I don't know for sure.
Reply